Why We Are Doing this Study

We are interested in describing the specific ways that caregivers ‘design’ their talk so that their autistic children are able to be part of the interaction, without having to rely on spoken language. We are also interested in the kinds of things autistic children who have very little spoken language do to participate in interactions with their caregivers. This could be things like coordinating their play actions with their caregivers’ actions or talk, using the rhythm of their vocalizations to convey meaning, or using their bodies to participate in interactions.

What We Are Doing

We are analyzing a set of videos of caregivers and young autistic children playing together with toys, that was collected for previous research. Using conversation analysis, we will look for specific things in these videos, like how caregivers pose questions to their children, and what they do if their children don’t respond to their questions or requests for the child to do something.

What We Are Hoping to Find Out

We would like to be able to describe the mechanics of how interactions between caregivers and their young autistic children work, when children are not yet talking. Some of our initial analyses suggest that caregivers pose questions so that what the child is already doing can serve as an answer to their question, such as  in the following interaction (things that the child does are put in parentheses):

 

Child: (puts a block on the tower)

Caregiver: What are you working on? Are you building the blocks?

Child: (puts another block on the tower)

Caregiver: Oh you are building the blocks, nice work!

 

In this interaction, when the child continues their play of building the tower, the caregiver takes this as a ‘yes’ to their question. We can see that they are taking the child’s actions as a response to their question by the way they close the interaction- by confirming that the child is building the blocks and offering them praise. The caregivers question and confirmation serve as an ‘envelope’ to the child’s actions, and allow the child to be involved in an interaction sequence with minimal effort. These kinds of episodes could be part of how children learn about how interactions work.

Related Publications

Bottema-Beutel, K., Park, H., & Kim, S.Y. (2018). Commentary on social skills training curricula for individuals with ASD: An examination of social interaction, authenticity, and stigma. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(3), 953-964. 

Bottema-Beutel, K. (2017). Glimpses into the blind spot: Social interaction and autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 68, 24-34.

Bottema-Beutel, K., & White, R. (2016). By the book: An analysis of adolescents with autism spectrum condition co-constructing fictional narratives with peers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(2), 361-377.

Bottema-Beutel, K., Louick, R., & White, R. (2015). Repetition, response mobilization, and face: Analysis of group interactions with a 19-year-old with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Communication Disorders, 58, 179-193.

Bottema-Beutel, K., & Smith, N. (2013). The interactional construction of identity: An adolescent with autism in interaction with peers. Linguistics and Education, 24, 197-214.

Bottema-Beutel, K. (2011). The negotiation of footing and participation structure in a social group of teens with and without autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Interactional Research in Communication Disorders, 2, 61-83.